How Anthropic ships Claude with Claude: Separating the Brain from the Hands
Katelyn Lesse and Angela Jiang on Opus 5.5, the Claude Platform, and the engineering behind AI agents.
AI NEWS JOURNAL
Search AI news
Search headlines, summaries and articles to connect the dots.
How Anthropic ships the #1 LLM in the World safely: Separating the Brain from the Hands
Katelyn Lesse and Angela Jiang join Latent Space to explain the engineering behind the Claude Platform: launching Opus 5.5, separating the model’s “brain” from the agent’s “hands,” scaling APIs, and building reliable managed agents. A new introduction ...
Regarding the Kimi quota issue, Anthropic has found a solution.
After the release of K3.1 Pro, due to numerous users reporting that their quotas were being depleted too quickly, Moonshot AI urgently issued an announcement stating, “The issue lies with us, and we should have fixed it sooner.” Alongside compensating affected users, Moonshot AI also indicated that it would “reduce unnecessary sub-agent calls and output lengths.” Just two days before the model went live, Anthropic published an article titled “Building agents: When to fold subagents into your main agent loop,” which addressed precisely the topic of sub-agents. Anthropic concluded that, by comparing Claude deployments across multiple companies, they found that a single agent equipped with specific skills actually outperformed “a group of...”
Anthropic files its prospectus, with违规 users contributing at least 5% of its revenue; the Hurun Rich List’s top 100 includes AI heavyweights such as Liang Wenfeng | What’s happening in the AI world again?
1. GPT-6.1 Terra, better suited for workers, has launched, with API prices cut in half and faster computer operations On October 26, OpenAI released GPT-6.1 Terra, focusing on enhancing visual comprehension, computer operations, factual accuracy, and programming capabilities, ....
Most computing power, slowest progress: ByteDance’s large model stuck in a race-to-the-bottom approach
The old “horse racing + short-cycle evaluation” approach can no longer be sustained.
From Large Language Models to World Models
Yan Deli, a senior expert at Tencent: LLMs are probabilistic models. They do not truly understand language; rather, they predict the next token (Next Token Prediction). Essentially, they are monotonous “word-chain” machines—moving forward one step at a time without retracing their path. At their core, LLMs are probabilistic models that learn, from statistical co-occurrence patterns, “what often appears alongside what,” and output “this is usually the case,” without grasping “why it is so.”...
In the era of large models, who will become that “iPhone” no one is willing to replace?
The champion on the AI rankings may change, but the products users rely on every day don’t necessarily. The next round of competition in large models will hinge not just on whose model is stronger, but on turning a single use into a habit.
Just now, GPT-6.1 Terra was released at a discounted price, and the salaried worker model of the Agent era has arrived.
OpenAI has once again raised the bar for the cost-effectiveness of large models. #Follow iFanr’s official WeChat account: iFanr (WeChat ID: ifanr) for more exciting content delivered to you第一时间.
SLICE-Mem: Salience-Gated Lightweight Information Curation for Efficient LLM Agent Memory
arXiv:2610.33015v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-term memory enables large language model (LLM) agents to maintain personalized and temporally coherent interactions, but repeated LLM inference for memory admission, extraction, and organization introduces substantial cost and latency. We present SLICE-Mem, a lightweight memory framework that combines salience-guided admission and predicate-centered information extraction. A compact classifier identifies user turns worth retaining, and a semantic-dependency-based extractor converts admitted turns into concise memory entries. This online pipeline requires no generative LLM calls, while cross-entry reconciliation is deferred to an offline consolidation stage. We evaluate SLICE-Mem on the weekly subset of Memora and LongMemEval-S using 8B a
Async-RBench: Benchmarking Asynchronous Task Execution in LLM Agents
arXiv:2610.32429v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly execute tasks asynchronously: a main agent continues working while its subagents run, and the task state may change before their results arrive. The main agent must decide which work to update or preserve and which checks to repeat, while avoiding prohibited changes. Final task success alone does not reveal whether these results were handled correctly, and natural asynchronous arrivals are hard to reproduce. We introduce Async-RBench, a benchmark for asynchronous task execution in LLM agents, with 200 executable tasks covering eight scenarios. A scenario controller regulates result delivery using predefined task-state conditions, while an Event Response Contract (ERC) specifies what each response
Recursive Semantic Divergence for LLM Agent Consistency
arXiv:2610.33012v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) agents with tool use exhibit inconsistent behavior across independent runs from identical states, calling different tools, producing contradictory outputs, or pursuing divergent strategies. This variability compounds over time and undermines deployment reliability. Existing evaluation metrics primarily measure task correctness via completion-based scores and do not capture consistency in agent behavior across executions. Separately, agent behavior is analyzed either at the token level using probability distributions or at the single-response level using semantic clustering, but neither captures how inconsistency propagates across future turns of a trajectory. We introduce Recursive Semantic Divergence (RSD), an unsu
Knowledge-Guided LLM for Intent-Driven Service Orchestration in Integrated Terrestrial and Non-Terrestrial 6G Networks
arXiv:2610.33007v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Natural-language service intents in integrated terrestrial and non-terrestrial (TN/NTN) 6G networks can be incomplete, ambiguous, or inconsistent, making unconstrained LLM generation challenging for reliable network-facing orchestration. This paper proposes a knowledge-guided LLM framework that combines grammar-constrained semantic parsing with a knowledge-graph (KG)-driven clarification loop to produce validated, orchestration-ready service profiles across four representative service classes. On a 200-sample intent dataset, the framework achieves 89% classification accuracy and 95% policy validity with an average of 0.66 clarification turns per request. Compared with a Pure-LLM baseline, the proposed framework improves policy validity and co
Position, Role or Label? A Controlled Study of Instruction Conflicts in LLM Agents
arXiv:2610.33201v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents take instructions from the operator, repository configuration, user, tool results and saved memory, which often conflict. Instruction-hierarchy benchmarks ask whether the higher-ranked source wins, but a source sets position, role and label at once. First, we build WhoWins, 1,080 code-scored scenarios in five task types, each with up to five mutually exclusive instructions, and seven controlled experiments that vary only how instructions are delivered. Second, we study 14 open-weight models (0.6B to 122B, thinking off and on) over 1,887,356 scored replies, checking main findings on held-out scenarios. Inside one message the first of two conflicting lines wins 72.42 to 94.66%, and across messages it keeps 22.95 to 62.65%. A policy s
EviGround-CT: Sentence-to-Volume Grounding for Verifying LLM-Generated Chest CT Reports
arXiv:2610.33038v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Chest computed tomography (CT) reports generated by large language models (LLMs) can describe positive findings that lack localized evidence in the scan. We propose EviGround-CT to verify these findings after report generation. A deterministic extractor identifies positive finding sentences, and a 3D grounding model predicts an evidence mask for each sentence. Using the full sentence retains anatomical location, laterality, and descriptive modifiers in the grounding query. We evaluate report generation on CT-RATE, and grounding and verification on a held-out 100-case ReXGroundingCT subset. Using the available annotations, sentence-grounded verification raises evidence-supported precision (ESP) from 0.263 to 0.365 across 137 extracted in-scope
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B 24GB: A Hybrid Vision-Language Model for Local AI
arXiv:2610.33039v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We introduce Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B 24GB, a hybrid Mamba-Transformer vision-language model that optimizes speed and intelligence per GB of memory used for local agentic workloads. Derived from the Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B-A12B model family, Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B 24GB combines Star Elastic compression with 2-bit Quantization-Aware Distillation for memory-constrained deployment. The model is optimized for reasoning, agentic tool use, and web & terminal interactions. We also trained a LiLiCorr speculative drafter that is released alongside the model to reach our target inference speed. The resulting model achieves a higher accuracy than leading models with similar memory footprints and speed across many benchmarks for general agentic ca
Each Insufficient in Its Own Way: Calibrating Language Models Across Varying Evidence States
arXiv:2610.33237v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: How can a language model know whether it has enough evidence to answer? Language models tend to answer even when the evidence they have is insufficient. Deciding whether to answer or gather more evidence requires a calibrated estimate of how likely an answer is to be correct with the available evidence. However, most calibration work treats the input as fixed, without asking how this estimate should change with the evidence. We introduce \emph{evidence-state calibration}, which requires a model's confidence before answering to match its probability of answering correctly and to change accordingly whenever the evidence changes this probability. We propose \ours{} (\textbf{Suffi}ciency \textbf{C}onfidence \textbf{E}stimation), which fine-tunes
Beyond Gain: Measuring Skill Internalization for Agent Skill Retirement
arXiv:2610.32322v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents retrieve skills from public hubs that hold up to about 100,000 entries and serve many models. As models improve, a hub must find the skills a given model has internalized, meaning it can do without them, and retire them for that model, yet internalization has not been measured with known reliability. Published rules that compare runs with and without a skill retire on the gain alone. The gain is near zero both for an internalized skill and when neither the model nor the skill delivers the capability, a state we call uncovered. We instead withhold the skill, score the model on a task synthesized from it, and trust a high unaided score only when another model gains from the skill, since nearly half of high scores come from tasks no m
Solvent: Long-Horizon Reasoning for Multi-Step Retrosynthesis
arXiv:2610.32308v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-step retrosynthesis requires recursively transforming a target molecule through successive reaction steps into purchasable building blocks, and recent work has begun to draw on large language model (LLM) reasoning to tackle the task. In its latest evolution, LLM reasoning has entered the long-horizon regime: models pursue objectives across interdependent steps, interact with environments, and adapt to feedback. This shift has markedly advanced LLM capabilities, as illustrated by breakthroughs in AI-driven mathematical research. At this frontier, we introduce Solvent, an 8B LLM that successfully extends long-horizon reasoning to multi-step retrosynthesis. Through a two-round post-training curriculum, Solvent learns to interleave iterativ
DMAIC-Bench: From Self-Reflection to Self-Restraint for Agents in Multi-Stage Analytical Tasks
arXiv:2610.32305v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-stage analytical tasks require LLM agents to use intermediate evidence to decide whether to continue, redirect or stop. Self-reflection, in which an agent critiques its output, is widely studied, yet a critique does not show whether evidence changed the next action. We call that capability self-restraint. Existing agent benchmarks largely measure task completion or output quality and leave it untested. DMAIC-Bench evaluates it with 97 seeded tasks across 15 industrial cases in four sectors, built around Lean Six Sigma's explicit statistical prerequisites. Paired counterfactual variants require opposite actions at the same workflow position, distinguishing warranted restraint from indiscriminate stopping. We assess execution traces with
LeafSkill: Efficient Leaf-Level Action Grounding for Recursive LLM Agents
arXiv:2610.32412v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recursive large language model (LLM) agents solve long-horizon tasks through decomposition, execution, and environmental feedback. Yet after producing an atomic subtask, they often invoke the same large model again to translate a familiar instruction into an executable action. We observe that high-level planning is task-specific, whereas leaf-level action grounding recurs across tasks and can be checked against environment-admitted actions. We introduce LeafSkill, an external reuse layer that retrieves semantically related grounding experience, binds action templates to current objects and admissible actions, and uses a lightweight 1.7B selector to choose a bound action or defer the unchanged subtask to the original agent. Skills remain outsi