Search AI news

ProcessPrefBench: Evaluating Cross-Task Transfer of Individual Process Preferences from Naturalistic Human-AI Interaction

arXiv:2611.06065v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In natural human-AI dialogue, users' corrections, requests, and self-descriptions carry reusable signals about how they want work to be done. These signals reveal individual process preferences, user-specific standards for evidence, depth, analytical focus, procedure, and delivery. We ask whether a preference revealed in one dialogue can shape an assistant's later answer when the task does not restate it. ProcessPrefBench uses three months of natural dialogues from two knowledge workers to build 66 source-target cases separately judged for source evidence and target applicability. Sources are preselected, so the benchmark tests application rather than retrieval. We test three models with target-only, full-history, and distilled-preference prompts. Target-specific 0-2 rubrics score preference realization, and a task gate flags severe failures. Compared with target-only prompting, full-history and imperative distilled-preference prompting raise preference realization by 0.204 and 0.244 points on the 0-2 scale, respectively, with no reliable advantage from distillation. Fabricated-evidence failures rise from 5.8% under target-only prompting to 10.1% under full-history and 10.4% under imperative prompting. ProcessPrefBench highlights a tension in learning from dialogue, where drawing on prior interactions can improve preference realization yet also invite fabricated evidence. We hope it helps build assistants that honor a user's process preferences without sacrificing factual reliability.

Assurance-Conditioned Continuous Authorization for Autonomous AI Agents

arXiv:2611.05632v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autonomous software agents can act through tools, delegate work, and change their models or execution environments while earlier authorizations remain in flight. We present Assurance-Conditioned Continuous Authorization (ACCA), an approach designed to be harness-independent, for maintaining operational authority according to currently justified assurance. It distinguishes evidence validity from contextual applicability, derives assurance claims from eligible evidence, and resolves a multidimensional effective-authority envelope within a principal-declared ceiling and applicable policy. A typed dependency graph supports selective re-evaluation of authorization-relevant changes. An authority epoch changes when effective authority changes; a distinct optional authorization-basis version supports revalidation of action-specific authorization conditions. Protected effect-time enforcement can reject stale actions before a consequential resource change, subject to the available commit mechanism. A compositional Domain Governance Profile expresses domain-specific semantics without granting authority. Controlled scenario tests implemented as a regression suite using a trading profile exercise default-deny rules, evidence-conditioned contraction and recovery, policy divergence, selective non-response, and stale-action rejection at a local gateway before the simulated-broker boundary. The study establishes implementation-level evidence in one domain, not a cross-domain guarantee of harmful-behavior prevention.

Do We Still Need Rotation-Invariant Architectures? A Statistical Robustness Benchmark for Point Cloud Classification

arXiv:2611.03952v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A substantial line of work builds rotation invariance directly into point cloud architectures. We benchmark 10 architectures (PointNet, PointNet++, DGCNN, RIConv, RIConv++, RISurConv, PointMLP, PointTransformer, and the equivariant VN-PointNet and VN-DGCNN) across 5 domains under pose, noise, and occlusion, and analyze the results with confirmatory hypothesis tests rather than point estimates. The three rotation-invariant (RI) architectures achieve the best pose robustness but rank among the lowest on noise robustness in 4 of 5 domains. We ask whether this cost is intrinsic to invariance or specific to how invariance is obtained. We retrain all 10 architectures unchanged, with a simple invariance loss on the embedding and three training seeds each, and evaluate all models on the independently designed ModelNet40-C. Invariance training transfers narrowly but reliably. It improves exactly the corruption families its perturbations target wherever the baseline has headroom (mean occlusion +10.5, lidar +13.4 percentage points of accuracy). At matched training budget the best standard backbone and the best RI architecture end on par on unseen corruptions (within 2.5 percentage points in every seed), and invariance-trained RIConv++ is the most seed-stable top model. Once rotation augmentation is widened, standard backbones concede only a flat, angle-independent accuracy offset under full-sphere rotation. We release the benchmark along with a package for analyzing point cloud robustness and reproducing our results.

LOLPlay: Benchmarking Real-Time Visual Agents in League of Legends

arXiv:2611.03685v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Visual agents need to coordinate reasoning and action while their environment evolves during inference. We introduce LOLPlay, a benchmark in native \emph{League of Legends} with 36 champion-specific tasks spanning resource management, combat, cooperation, and objectives. Agents interact through screenshots and mouse--keyboard actions; automated initialization and 82 executable subgoal checks distinguish partial progress from completion. Across 324 task evaluations of three models at three reasoning-effort settings, GPT-6 Astra achieves the highest task success rate of 25.0\% at low and medium effort, and the highest subgoal success rate of 40.3\% at medium effort. However, high effort improves neither metric over low effort for any model. For Astra, longer requests leave fewer interaction rounds, suggesting a cost to additional reasoning in real-time control. Trajectories reveal incomplete subgoal composition and actions executing after the observed scene changes, motivating agents that combine visual reasoning with timely action.

ScienceVision: Can AI Observe and Reason Like a Scientist?

arXiv:2611.04087v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scientific discovery builds on accurate observations interpreted through domain knowledge and reasoning. For scientific 3D data, this requires understanding structures and spatial relationships, from protein contacts to anatomical organization. Existing multimodal benchmarks largely evaluate text and 2D images, while scientific 3D evaluations vary in representations and protocols across disciplines, limiting cross-disciplinary comparison. To assess these foundational capabilities, we introduce ScienceVision, a cross-domain benchmark for scientific 3D understanding and reasoning through expert-level visual question answering (VQA). We construct 250 questions, with 50 each from Biology, Chemistry, Medical Imaging, Mechanical CAD, and Architecture, through a pipeline combining synthetic question generation with domain-expert review and annotation. Each task pairs a native 3D artifact with a scientific question, a specified response format, and a task-specific reference answer, requiring domain knowledge to be applied to geometric or topological evidence. We evaluate 12 models on the same questions in three settings: visual question answering with native 3D artifacts accessed through an agent harness's file and code-execution tools; the same workflow augmented with expert-inspired viewer inspection and measurement tools exposed through the Model Context Protocol (MCP); and visual question answering from prescribed rendered 2D images using an agent harness. All settings use the same task-specific deterministic final-answer scoring. The inspection environment supports view changes, target isolation, and slice inspection. In this main comparison, the best mean answer score is 0.53 out of 1. Mean scores in the native-artifact workflow without additional MCP tools exceed those in the rendered-image workflow for every model, by 17.2 percentage points on average.

Towards Automatic Heart Murmur Characterization from Multi-spot Phonocardiograms

arXiv:2611.03654v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Cardiac auscultation traditionally detects the presence of a heart murmur, but clinicians further characterize it by timing, shape, pitch, quality, and grade. Most automatic phonocardiogram analysis systems stop at binary detection and do not estimate this richer description. In this work, we formulate automatic murmur characterization as five patient-level classification tasks and compare three multi-spot strategies on recordings from the aortic, pulmonary, mitral, and tricuspid auscultation locations. First, classical and deep-learning classifiers are trained independently at each location, and predictions are combined via a maximum-severity late-fusion rule. Second, a synchronous multi-input CNN jointly processes one representative segment per location for a single task. Third, a unified multi-input, multi-output CNN predicts all five attributes from one shared multi-spot representation. Using 735 patients from the CirCor DigiScope dataset with complete four-spot recordings, the best late-fusion configurations reach an unweighted mean sensitivity between 85.56% and 93.81% across the five tasks, with class-specific recalls between 80.00% and 100.00% for every relevant category. The multi-input CNN trails late fusion by 7-16 points depending on the task, while the multi-output model reaches values between 72.59% and 79.40%, estimating all five attributes from one shared representation. We further show that naively balancing training data by adding all minority-class segments degrades patient-level performance under the maximum-severity rule, since it introduces non-representative, noisy segments not filtered by the clustering-based segment selection used for evaluation. These results indicate multi-spot murmur characterization is feasible with both fusion-based and jointly learned architectures, outlining a path toward automatic, structured murmur reports complementing binary screening.

We Ran a Research Sprint With AI. The AI Worked. The Research Didn't

arXiv:2611.03946v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generative AI tools for research are widely deployed, yet individual productivity gains do not guarantee better team research. We argue that how AI use is structured matters alongside access. Personal AI tools may amplify two failures under deadline pressure: a consumption bottleneck, in which generation outpaces team-visible evaluation, and AI-induced research silos, in which private human-AI loops displace shared decision-making. We motivate this position with a mechanism-generating pilot: a 100-minute research sprint with twelve researchers in three independently operating teams, within a seventeen-person session. Both patterns recurred across teams and evidence sources. Of 33 logged AI interactions, one was accepted outright and 27 lacked a recorded disposition; missing records alone do not establish absent evaluation. A parallel autonomous pipeline produced a complete draft without in-session human evaluation, illustrating production capacity rather than comparative quality. We propose Human-AI-Human collaboration: an interaction topology in which AI connects researchers' contexts and supports inspectable collective evaluation and decision-making. The pilot does not isolate AI-specific effects from time pressure or workflow practices. We close with seven modular, falsifiable design hypotheses, prioritizing shared context and team-visible evaluation checkpoints for controlled follow-up.

Fix evaluation bias to unlock better models on Amazon Bedrock

Property Finder found that 96.8% of their vision-AI evaluation labels were inherited from the incumbent model, hiding its true accuracy. See how they built unbiased ground truth, applied evolutionary prompt optimization, and selected a more accurate, cost-effective model on Amazon Bedrock, cutting cost by 86% across 11 image-quality attributes.

Exowatt beats frontier models on accuracy with SageMaker serverless model customization

In this post, we show how Exowatt used Amazon SageMaker AI serverless model customization to build a repeatable AI pipeline that produces task-specific fine-tuned models for two deployment targets, edge and cloud, achieving higher accuracy than frontier models at up to 49x lower cost.

Two Uncertainties Are Not One: Disagreement versus Decision-Risk in Cheap Structured Content Moderation

arXiv:2610.33258v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Content moderation compresses a graded, contested human judgment into a binary act (leave up / take down) over billions of items, at a scale where running a frontier LLM on every post is uneconomical. A new class of frozen "System One" models returns typed, calibrated decisions instead of text at ~USD 0.000025 per call and ~100 ms. We run the first independent audit of one such model on 142,658 human-labeled comments, and benchmark it against 14 frontier reasoning models (the GPT-5.x, Claude, Gemini 3, and Grok families) on a shared probe set. Two findings stand out. First, the cheap model is accuracy-competitive: its zero-shot classification AUROC (0.83) is not statistically separable (paired bootstrap, n=56; a failure to reject parity, not

A Benchmark for Controllable Speaking-Style Captioning in Audio-Language Models

arXiv:2610.33036v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Speaking-style captioning (SSC) aims to generate natural language descriptions of how speech is delivered, capturing paralinguistic attributes such as vocal timbre, prosody, and expressivity. Many downstream applications, including conversational AI agents, controllable speech generation, and large-scale audio annotation, require dimension-specific style captions that describe targeted aspects of speech (e.g., speaker traits, emotion, or delivery style), rather than a single undifferentiated description. However, existing work lacks a unified formulation for controllable speaking-style captioning. We address this gap by formulating SSC as an instruction-following audio-language task, where explicit instructions specify the speaking-style dime

A Unified Queueing-Based Framework for Comparative Evaluation of Serverless Autoscaling Strategies under Bursty Workloads

arXiv:2610.35564v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Serverless computing platforms must preserve quality of service (QoS) while adapting to highly bursty and unpredictable workloads. To cope with workload fluctuations while satisfying QoS requirements and service-level agreements (SLAs), these platforms rely on automatic resource scaling. Commercial function-as-a-service (FaaS) platforms employ different autoscaling strategies to dynamically adjust the number of active function instances and the available processing capacity. In this work, three representative autoscaling strategies are modeled and compared: scale-per-request (SPR), concurrencylevel scaling (CLS), and metric-based scaling (MBS). To enable systematic evaluation independent of proprietary platform-specific implementations, we de

How Data Culture measured its way from zero trust to a shippable AI analytics agent

Data Culture built a 3-step evaluation framework that took one AI analytics deployment from 0% accuracy to 94.7%.

Optimizing Streaming Speech Recognition on Arm® Edge Devices with ExecuTorch

When you’re speaking to a device, you expect text to appear as you talk. That makes streaming automatic speech recognition (ASR) a different challenge from batch transcription, where the model... The post Optimizing Streaming Speech Recognition on Arm® Edge Devices with ExecuTorch appeared first on PyTorch.

Tampered ML: Evaluating LLM Judgment of Machine Learning Research

arXiv:2610.32114v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: One approach to accelerating progress on AI alignment is to automate parts of alignment research itself. Doing so requires systems that can perform reliably on hard-to-supervise research tasks, including identifying flaws in research proposals and evaluating whether a proposed experiment supports its intended claim. To evaluate this capability, we introduce Tampered ML, a benchmark of 1,858 item-pairs, each consisting of an experiment proposal reconstructed from a published machine learning paper and a minimally edited counterfactual that introduces a targeted methodological flaw. Models must identify the more methodologically sound proposal in both presentation orders. A human validation study on a stratified sample estimates that 86% of ite

In LLM evaluation, relying solely on the overall F1 score to validate automated scorers carries the risk of misleading results: a new study underscores the need to calibrate for prompt-specific differences.

An arXiv paper (2610.31678v1) points out that, in interactive evaluations of large language models, relying solely on the overall accuracy or F1 score of automated scorers can mask prompt-specific errors, leading to misjudgments of prompt effects. Empirical evidence shows that the same scorer exhibits substantial variation in its false-positive rate across different prompts (2.6%–33.3%), and a seemingly significant 9.3-point effect shrinks to 2.3 points—and becomes non-significant—under dual-LLM review.

Why it matters：This study, based on real experimental data (6 models, 180 fictional entity‑based questions, and 6 prompt conditions), reveals a widespread methodological flaw in current LLM evaluations: equating the scorer’s overall performance with its reliability on key benchmark tasks. Its central claim—that each prompt must be audited separately and uncertainty must be incorporated—rests on clear empirical evidence and offers actionable recommendations, making it highly timely (published on 2026‑10‑26) and backed by a credible source (the arXiv preprint platform).

Research reveals the “norm–oracle gap” problem in benchmarking coding agents.

A paper published on arXiv on October 24, 2026, points out that current mainstream benchmarks for coding AIs—such as SWE-Milestone—suffer from a “specification–oracle gap”: the natural-language descriptions of tasks fail to capture crucial implementation details required for testing (e.g., constant names, module paths, and precise error messages), resulting in evaluations that measure the ability to reproduce upstream code rather than genuine understanding and reasoning.

Why it matters：This study is the first to formally define this type of bias, develop a static analysis tool covering five languages (with 89.2% precision and 92.9% recall), and empirically demonstrate in SWE-Milestone that 25 milestone tasks contain non-inferable implicit dependencies, significantly increasing the failure rate (80.6% vs. 48.4%). These findings reveal that current leaderboards may systematically favor “name‑copying” agents. The results have been made publicly available, including the open-source auditing tool and corrective resources, offering both methodological and practical value.

Extending the Context Length to 1M Tokens!

API Documentation (Chinese) HuggingFace Demo ModelScope Demo Introduction After the release of Qwen2.5, we heard the community’s demand for processing longer contexts. In recent months, we have made many optimizations for the model capabilities and inference performance of extremely long context. Today, we are proud to introduce the new Qwen2.5-Turbo version, which features: Longer Context Support: We have extended the model’s context length from 128k to 1M, which is approximately 1 million English words or 1.

Introducing Qwen2-Math

GITHUB HUGGING FACE MODELSCOPE DISCORD 🚨 This model mainly supports English. We will release bilingual (English and Chinese) math models soon. Introduction Over the past year, we have dedicated significant effort to researching and enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models, with a particular focus on their ability to solve arithmetic and mathematical problems. Today, we are delighted to introduce a series of math-specific large language models of our Qwen2 series, Qwen2-Math and Qwen2-Math-Instruct-1.

Hello Qwen2

GITHUB HUGGING FACE MODELSCOPE DEMO DISCORD Introduction After months of efforts, we are pleased to announce the evolution from Qwen1.5 to Qwen2. This time, we bring to you: Pretrained and instruction-tuned models of 5 sizes, including Qwen2-0.5B, Qwen2-1.5B, Qwen2-7B, Qwen2-57B-A14B, and Qwen2-72B; Having been trained on data in 27 additional languages besides English and Chinese; State-of-the-art performance in a large number of benchmark evaluations; Significantly improved performance in coding and mathematics; Extended context length support up to 128K tokens with Qwen2-7B-Instruct and Qwen2-72B-Instruct.