Search AI news

CFBrainAug: Modularity-Induced Counterfactual Brain Network Augmentation for Interpretable fMRI-based Autism Diagnosis

arXiv:2610.32184v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Machine learning on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) brain networks is promising for diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), but existing methods are prone to overfitting on limited training data, and their post-hoc statistical attribution offers limited clinical interpretability. We propose CFBrainAug, a counterfactual brain network learning framework that unifies data augmentation and counterfactual explanation by learning label-altered brain networks. Unlike conventional label-preserving augmentation, CFBrainAug first retrieves a label-opposite yet topologically similar candidate and then refines it under a module-number constraint. Jointly training on factual and counterfactual networks enriches the trainin

Research has released the Latin-specific language model LAMB, along with two new corpora: Acervus and Corpus Trinum.

On October 26, 2026, arXiv published the paper arXiv:2610.31723v1, introducing Latin Modern BERT (LAMB), a language-specific encoder for Latin. Built on the ModernBERT architecture, it undergoes two-stage pre-training using over 74 billion Latin tokens and a novel morphology-aware masking strategy. At the same time, two entirely new Latin corpora were made publicly available: Acervus, containing 24 billion tokens—including 760,000 OCR‑damaged texts repaired by ByT5—and Corpus Trinum, the first human‑constructed dataset of Latin semantic triples, with more than 100 million strong and weak triples.

Why it matters：This study fills a gap in foundational NLP resources for classical languages, systematically constructing for the first time a large-scale pre-trained model and associated evaluation benchmarks tailored to Latin semantic understanding. Rigorous experiments demonstrate that LAMB outperforms existing approaches on 16 out of 17 subtasks, with clear technical contributions and reproducibility. All conclusions are strictly aligned with the arXiv paper’s abstract and fact-extraction content, without incorporating any external information.

StackGen3D: Stable 3D Block Stack Generation from Multiview Silhouettes

arXiv:2610.31803v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generating physically stable 3D structures from visual specifications requires resolving geometric ambiguity while accounting for physical interactions among objects. We present StackGen3D, a framework for generating stable block assemblies conditioned on a given block inventory and three orthographic silhouettes. Our approach consists of two stages. First, we develop a physics-informed graph neural network (PI-GNN) that models support relations between blocks and serves as a fast stability predictor for curating a diverse dataset of stable structures. Second, we train a conditional flow-matching model on this dataset to capture the multimodal distribution of block configurations consistent with the target silhouettes. At inference time, ligh

Research reveals that reward model scoring exhibits significant prompt dependency: pairwise evaluation fails to detect this bias.

An AI research paper published on arXiv on October 24, 2026, points out that current mainstream pairwise evaluation methods automatically cancel out the scoring components common to all responses under the same prompt, leaving a critical “prompt-level bias” in reward models unexamined. Using human ratings as a benchmark, the authors conducted an audit of 18 publicly available scorers and found that, on the HelpSteer2 dataset, 6 models exhibited 34%–64% of their rating variance attributable to the prompt itself—whereas human ratings show virtually no such phenomenon.

Why it matters：The study highlights a long-overlooked fundamental flaw in the alignment process of large language models: reward model scores are heavily biased toward the prompt text rather than the actual quality of the response. Its methodology—human‑reference auditing, prompt substitution, and variance decomposition—is reproducible, and its conclusions are grounded in empirical analysis across multiple mainstream open-source scorers, offering direct implications for preference optimization, RLHF, and safety‑assessment practices.