Craft and taste
What does old me think
AI NEWS JOURNAL
Search AI news
Search headlines, summaries and articles to connect the dots.
Build shared workflows for your team with Copilot Automations
Shared Copilot Automations are rolling out, enabling teams to build and maintain AI-powered workflows together. With Copilot Automations, you can combine prompts, triggers, and tools to design workflows around the… The post Build shared workflows for your team with Copilot Automations appeared first on The GitHub Blog.
Coding From the Himalayas With an Offline AI Agent
How to set up and run an offline coding agent using OpenCode, Ollama and Qwen.
Quoting Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang
We think "did a human read the code?" is an imprecise proxy for "what could go wrong with this change, and which check—automated or human—is the right one to catch it?" Asking that question also changed when review happens. Before, review was a gate at the end of the road: write the code, open a PR, wait for your colleague. Now, review runs continuously, more like spellcheck while you write. Most changes have been reviewed and fixed by Claude at least once before a human is asked to look. This catches most routine mistakes, and saves team attention for higher-level questions and scrutiny. — Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang, How the Claude Code team does code review Tags: anthropic, claude, ai, claude-code, llms, addy-osmani, coding-agents, generative-ai, agentic-engineering,