Abstract:Context compression is now routine for language models with long inputs, but a compressed context is useful only if it keeps the evidence for the answer. Existing checks compare the reader model's answer or its most likely words, and thus miss a frequent failure, silent evidence loss: key evidence is removed while the answer stays the same, leaving the answer unsupported and risky for other models that reuse the context. To address this challenge, we propose SELD (Silent Evidence Loss Detector), which needs no training and no labels. Its principle is that when evidence is lost, a reader model's preferences among the answers it leaves unsaid shift even if its answer does not, so comparing these preferences before and after compression reveals losses that answer checks cannot see. We also build SEL-Pairs, a benchmark of length-matched evidence and control deletions from three question-answering datasets. Quantitative and qualitative experiments with five reader models on it show that SELD consistently outperforms strong and recent baselines across compressors, compression rates and models, identifying the evidence-removing edit in 83% of matched pairs with unchanged answers, against 70% for the strongest baseline. These results show that evidence loss in compressed contexts can be detected even when the answer is unchanged. Submission history Access Paper: View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source Additional Features Audio Summary Current browse context: References & Citations Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Bookmark Institution arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
AI NEWS JOURNAL
arXiv cs.CLAI NEWS / JOURNAL
SELD: Detecting Silent Evidence Loss in Context Compression beyond the Answer
arXiv:2611.12903v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Context compression is now routine for language models with long inputs, but a compressed context is useful only if it keeps the evidence for the answer. Existing checks compare the reader model's answer or its most likely words, and thus miss a frequent failure, silent evidence loss: key evidence is removed while the answer stays the same, leaving the answer unsupported and risky for other models that reuse the context. To address this challenge, we propose SELD (Silent Evidence Loss Detector), which needs no training and no labels. Its principle is that when evidence is lost, a reader model's preferences among the answers it leaves unsaid shift even if its answer does not, so comparing these preferences before and after compression reveals losses that answer checks cannot see. We also build SEL-Pairs, a benchmark of length-matched evidence and control deletions from three question-answering datasets. Quantitative and qualitative experiments with five reader models on it show that SELD consistently outperforms strong and recent baselines across compressors, compression rates and models, identifying the evidence-removing edit in 83% of matched pairs with unchanged answers, against 70% for the strongest baseline. These results show that evidence loss in compressed contexts can be detected even when the answer is unchanged.
翻译服务暂未运行，当前显示原文。