MODEL PROFILE · 模型档案

occamy-1.0-abliterated-FIT-GGUF

SC117 · occamy-1.0-abliterated-FIT-GGUF

FIT-GGUF v0.4.0 GATE-VERIFIED TIERS 5 FIT + 4 APEX-I- + BF16 ABLITERATED (INPUT-GATED) MEASURED KL + SAME-TOP VISION mmproj APACHE-2.0 Occamy-1.0-abliterated · FIT-GGUF Five fidelity tiers of a 256K-context 35B MoE with vision — the smallest GGUF that provably meets each KL gate, re-verified on its own bytes. Plus an independent APEX-I- family and the BF16 reference, all measured by the same protocol. 🧭 About FIT-GGUF — the tool behind these files Every FIT tier here was planned, executed and verified by FIT-GGUF , an open-source, deterministic tensor-level planning layer on top of llama.cpp quantization. Standard GGUF quantization asks you to pick one of a handful of presets; FIT-GGUF instead asks what quality do you want , then finds and verifies the smallest GGUF that demonstrably meets it. Traditional GGUF gives you presets. FIT gives you a fidelity contract: macro KL ≤ tier anchor, measured against this model's own BF16 on five fixed domains. Deterministic size prediction & byte-exact delivery ✅ Validated (G2 gate, delta = 0) Universally optimal tensor allocation ⚠️ Not established — FIT claims verified fidelity contracts, not a universal quality optimum Method, pre-registered research record and the fit CLI are all open source: github.com/Scorp1o117/FIT-GGUF ⚠️ Safety notice / 安全提示 The source model is an abliterated, refusal-removed model with no meaningful built-in guardrails, and may comply with harmful, illegal or unsafe requests. Use it only where you can provide appropriate moderation, access control and legal review. Do not deploy it to end users without your own safety layer. 源模型经过拒答方向消融,不具备可靠的内置安全护栏;请仅在合法、受控、具备审核与滥用防护的环境中使用,使用者自行承担部署责任。

译文排队中,当前展示来源原文。

视觉问答multimodalreasoninglicense:apache-2.0
上下文窗口来源未披露
输入 → 输出文本、图像 → 文本
模型权重待核验
档案更新时间2026/11/2 19:16:49
OVERVIEW

模型介绍

FIT-GGUF v0.4.0 GATE-VERIFIED TIERS 5 FIT + 4 APEX-I- + BF16 ABLITERATED (INPUT-GATED) MEASURED KL + SAME-TOP VISION mmproj APACHE-2.0 Occamy-1.0-abliterated · FIT-GGUF Five fidelity tiers of a 256K-context 35B MoE with vision — the smallest GGUF that provably meets each KL gate, re-verified on its own bytes. Plus an independent APEX-I- family and the BF16 reference, all measured by the same protocol. 🧭 About FIT-GGUF — the tool behind these files Every FIT tier here was planned, executed and verified by FIT-GGUF , an open-source, deterministic tensor-level planning layer on top of llama.cpp quantization. Standard GGUF quantization asks you to pick one of a handful of presets; FIT-GGUF instead asks what quality do you want , then finds and verifies the smallest GGUF that demonstrably meets it. Traditional GGUF gives you presets. FIT gives you a fidelity contract: macro KL ≤ tier anchor, measured against this model's own BF16 on five fixed domains. Deterministic size prediction & byte-exact delivery ✅ Validated (G2 gate, delta = 0) Universally optimal tensor allocation ⚠️ Not established — FIT claims verified fidelity contracts, not a universal quality optimum Method, pre-registered research record and the fit CLI are all open source: github.com/Scorp1o117/FIT-GGUF ⚠️ Safety notice / 安全提示 The source model is an abliterated, refusal-removed model with no meaningful built-in guardrails, and may comply with harmful, illegal or unsafe requests. Use it only where you can provide appropriate moderation, access control and legal review. Do not deploy it to end users without your own safety layer. 源模型经过拒答方向消融,不具备可靠的内置安全护栏;请仅在合法、受控、具备审核与滥用防护的环境中使用,使用者自行承担部署责任。

主要特点

特点摘要待依据来源补齐,不凭模型名称推断能力。

局限与注意事项

暂无足够来源支持具体缺点结论。请重点验证实际任务表现、时延、数据政策、许可与版本生命周期。

PRICING & COST

来源报价与费用分析

同一模型在不同渠道、地区和配置下可能采用不同价格。下表独立保留各渠道报价,不将渠道价格视为厂商官方统一价格。

来源 / 渠道输入输出计费单位采集时间
暂未取得可核验报价,请查阅来源渠道。

按月估算基础 Token 费用

—

预估不包含缓存优惠、阶梯定价、多模态附加费用、网络检索、税费及推理额外输出。

INDEPENDENT BENCHMARKS

公开评测与运行配置

暂无已采集的可核验公开评分。模型未上榜不代表能力较低。

查看完整已收录榜单 →

常见问题

开放权重是否代表可以免费商用?

不一定。应核对具体版本许可证、商用门槛和使用政策。自部署还会产生算力和维护成本。

这些价格是实时结算价格吗?

不是实时结算价格,而是带采集时间的来源报价快照。请到对应渠道核对当前版本、区域、折扣和计费方式。

资料来源与可追溯记录

许可证:apache-2.0。模型介绍与第三方评测均以原来源的具体版本和方法为准。