模型介绍
**Hardware-Accelerated Weights for Intel Arc GPUs (Battlemage Xe2 / Alchemist Xe / oneAPI SYCL)** *Engineered by Greatjedi & Gemini (DeepMind Antigravity Team)* If you own an **Intel Arc GPU** (such as the **Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB**, Arc A770 16GB, or Battlemage graphics cards) and have attempted to run popular 27B quantization variants (such as `IQ2_S`, `IQ3_XXS`, or Unsloth's "Dynamic" `UD-Q4_K_S`), you likely noticed your generation speed crawling at an agonizing **8.1 to 12.2 tokens/second**, despite the GPU having more than enough raw compute and 512 GB/s memory bandwidth. 1. **Intel Arc Matrix Engines (XMX)** utilize **DPAS** (Dot Product Accumulate Systolic) hardware. DPAS requires dense, linearly indexed integers (`INT2`, `INT4`, `INT8`) to feed its systolic pipeline at thousands of operations per clock cycle. 2. **I-Quants (`IQ2_S`, `IQ3_XXS`, `IQ4_XS`, `IQ3_S`)** use non-linear 8-dimensional vector lattice codebooks ($E_8$). They require runtime table lookups per weight element. 3. In `llama.cpp`'s SYCL backend, **there are zero kernel implementations for I-Quants**. Whenever an IQ tensor is evaluated, SYCL drops out of hardware systolic GEMM into slow CPU/host dequantization loops. 4. **The Hidden Catch in Unsloth "UD" Models**: When we reverse-engineered Unsloth's popular `Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q4_K_S.gguf`, we discovered it secretly contains **201 I-Quant tensors** (`IQ4_XS`, `IQ3_S`, `IQ3_XXS`), causing it to suffer from the exact same dequantization stall on Intel Arc!
主要特点
特点摘要待依据来源补齐,不凭模型名称推断能力。
局限与注意事项
暂无足够来源支持具体缺点结论。请重点验证实际任务表现、时延、数据政策、许可与版本生命周期。
来源报价与费用分析
同一模型在不同渠道、地区和配置下可能采用不同价格。下表独立保留各渠道报价,不将渠道价格视为厂商官方统一价格。
| 来源 / 渠道 | 输入 | 输出 | 计费单位 | 采集时间 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 暂未取得可核验报价,请查阅来源渠道。 | ||||
按月估算基础 Token 费用
预估不包含缓存优惠、阶梯定价、多模态附加费用、网络检索、税费及推理额外输出。
公开评测与运行配置
暂无已采集的可核验公开评分。模型未上榜不代表能力较低。
查看完整已收录榜单 →常见问题
开放权重是否代表可以免费商用?
不一定。应核对具体版本许可证、商用门槛和使用政策。自部署还会产生算力和维护成本。
这些价格是实时结算价格吗?
不是实时结算价格,而是带采集时间的来源报价快照。请到对应渠道核对当前版本、区域、折扣和计费方式。
资料来源与可追溯记录
许可证:apache-2.0。模型介绍与第三方评测均以原来源的具体版本和方法为准。