模型介绍
**A 27B model with its whole trained context window, at q8_0 KV precision, on one RTX 4070 12 GB. 78 tok/s of new text at 32k tokens of context (175 on code), 69 at 64k, 61 at 112k, and the window keeps going to 262k. Lossless speculative decoding at every depth. A server that answers the requests agents and apps actually send. One command on Windows.** This is PrismML's Ternary Bonsai 2 27B (1.58-bit ternary `PTQ1_0`, 5.9 GB, Apache 2.0), the same weights, nothing re-quantized, with its MTP draft head grafted back on (byte-identical trunk, proof below) and the serving stack from github.com/professorpalmer/bonsai-ada-surgery: a tiered KV cache that puts the first ~119k positions in VRAM and the rest in pinned system RAM with bit-identical output, MTP drafting that pays at every depth, harness-proofing for the apps that send `effort: "high"` or tiny output caps, and an optional server-side layer (exact API cards, an API check, a sandboxed Python tool) that lifts the model's coding and agentic scores without touching the weights. Measured 2026-10-08 (`bench/depth_table.sh`), a fresh prompt at each depth: 400-token greedy answers with the default drafting (lookup + MTP head); new text = an essay, code = a Python module; prefill = cumulative for the whole prompt; display on the CPU's iGPU. Every number has a receipt in the repository (`docs/Q8_FULL_CONTEXT.md`, `docs/RECEIPTS.md`, `docs/QUALITY.md`).
主要特点
特点摘要待依据来源补齐,不凭模型名称推断能力。
局限与注意事项
暂无足够来源支持具体缺点结论。请重点验证实际任务表现、时延、数据政策、许可与版本生命周期。
来源报价与费用分析
同一模型在不同渠道、地区和配置下可能采用不同价格。下表独立保留各渠道报价,不将渠道价格视为厂商官方统一价格。
| 来源 / 渠道 | 输入 | 输出 | 计费单位 | 采集时间 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 暂未取得可核验报价,请查阅来源渠道。 | ||||
按月估算基础 Token 费用
预估不包含缓存优惠、阶梯定价、多模态附加费用、网络检索、税费及推理额外输出。
公开评测与运行配置
暂无已采集的可核验公开评分。模型未上榜不代表能力较低。
查看完整已收录榜单 →常见问题
开放权重是否代表可以免费商用?
不一定。应核对具体版本许可证、商用门槛和使用政策。自部署还会产生算力和维护成本。
这些价格是实时结算价格吗?
不是实时结算价格,而是带采集时间的来源报价快照。请到对应渠道核对当前版本、区域、折扣和计费方式。
资料来源与可追溯记录
许可证:apache-2.0。模型介绍与第三方评测均以原来源的具体版本和方法为准。