模型介绍
NVIDIA's refusal behaviour projected out of the released weights, baked into Atomic Dynamic GGUF builds and shipped as a 3.5 MB LoRA, measured against the original. On held-out JailbreakBench prompts refusals fall from 93.8% to 1.2%, on the safe XSTest prompts from 9.2% to 0.4%, and with thinking on from 29 of 30 to none. MMLU: 68.50% before, 67.85% after (2000 questions, McNemar p = 0.21). Tool calls and long context are unaffected. You can now run the Uncensored Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B in Atomic Chat , locally on your own machine. One release-gate is not met, and we say so: on harmless prompts the first token moves further from the original than our 0.10 limit (KL 0.141). On this model even a random direction edited the same way moves neutral text noticeably ( limitations ). Gemma 4 normalises every write into the residual stream with its own weights before adding it, so the edit is computed through those norms: each matrix stops writing the refusal direction as it lands in the stream, not before the norm. Built on the same weights as our Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B quants ; the LoRA loads on top of any of those files. KLD and top-1 are against the **original, unmodified** BF16 model on our held-out neutral text (24 chunks of 4096 tokens), so they hold the edit and the quantization together. The edit alone, on the BF16 weights, is 0.159; the plain `AD-Q6_K` of the original model is 0.026 and `AD-Q4_K_M` 0.091 on the same text, so at `AD-Q6_K` almost all of the distance is the edit itself.
主要特点
特点摘要待依据来源补齐,不凭模型名称推断能力。
局限与注意事项
暂无足够来源支持具体缺点结论。请重点验证实际任务表现、时延、数据政策、许可与版本生命周期。
来源报价与费用分析
同一模型在不同渠道、地区和配置下可能采用不同价格。下表独立保留各渠道报价,不将渠道价格视为厂商官方统一价格。
| 来源 / 渠道 | 输入 | 输出 | 计费单位 | 采集时间 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 暂未取得可核验报价,请查阅来源渠道。 | ||||
按月估算基础 Token 费用
预估不包含缓存优惠、阶梯定价、多模态附加费用、网络检索、税费及推理额外输出。
公开评测与运行配置
暂无已采集的可核验公开评分。模型未上榜不代表能力较低。
查看完整已收录榜单 →常见问题
开放权重是否代表可以免费商用?
不一定。应核对具体版本许可证、商用门槛和使用政策。自部署还会产生算力和维护成本。
这些价格是实时结算价格吗?
不是实时结算价格,而是带采集时间的来源报价快照。请到对应渠道核对当前版本、区域、折扣和计费方式。
资料来源与可追溯记录
许可证:other。模型介绍与第三方评测均以原来源的具体版本和方法为准。