Abstract:Objective: It is not known whether the input representation governs the quality of explanations of deep learning models for electrocardiogram analysis. Risk of dangerous ventricular repolarisation is judged from the QT-interval and the shape of the T-wave, features that are hard to assess visually and harder still to verify in a model's reasoning. We evaluate a pseudo-colour encoding filling the area beneath the QT interval, its colour sequence designed from clinical electrophysiology knowledge and mapped to a validated risk prediction model, the QT-nomogram. Methods: Two identically configured residual networks were trained on single-heartbeat images from a clinical trial, differing only in whether pseudo-colour encoding was applied, so that any difference is attributable to the chromatic channel alone. To externally validate the effect, both models were applied without fine-tuning or threshold tuning to a previously unseen epilepsy cohort from the UK-Biobank at two visits, and eight explanation methods compared on faithfulness, localisation and stability. Results: The pseudo-colour model achieved areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.903 and 0.914 at the first and follow-up visits, against 0.719 and 0.720 for the monochrome model, recovering three to five times as many at-risk heartbeats at comparable specificity. Pseudo-colour encoding improved explanation localisation and stability for almost every method, and the improvement reproduced across both visits. Conclusion: The input representation is a controllable and previously overlooked determinant of both predictive performance and explanation quality. Significance: Treating interpretability as a representation-design problem offers a route towards explanations clinicians can check against known electrophysiology. Submission history Access Paper: View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source Additional Features Audio Summary Current browse context: References & Citations Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Bookmark Institution arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
AI NEWS JOURNAL
arXiv cs.CVAI NEWS / JOURNAL
Clinically Informed Colour Encoding Improves the Localisation and Stability of Explanations in Deep Learning ECG Models: External Validation in a UK Biobank Epilepsy Cohort
arXiv:2611.09971v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Objective: It is not known whether the input representation governs the quality of explanations of deep learning models for electrocardiogram analysis. Risk of dangerous ventricular repolarisation is judged from the QT-interval and the shape of the T-wave, features that are hard to assess visually and harder still to verify in a model's reasoning. We evaluate a pseudo-colour encoding filling the area beneath the QT interval, its colour sequence designed from clinical electrophysiology knowledge and mapped to a validated risk prediction model, the QT-nomogram. Methods: Two identically configured residual networks were trained on single-heartbeat images from a clinical trial, differing only in whether pseudo-colour encoding was applied, so that any difference is attributable to the chromatic channel alone. To externally validate the effect, both models were applied without fine-tuning or threshold tuning to a previously unseen epilepsy cohort from the UK-Biobank at two visits, and eight explanation methods compared on faithfulness, localisation and stability. Results: The pseudo-colour model achieved areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.903 and 0.914 at the first and follow-up visits, against 0.719 and 0.720 for the monochrome model, recovering three to five times as many at-risk heartbeats at comparable specificity. Pseudo-colour encoding improved explanation localisation and stability for almost every method, and the improvement reproduced across both visits. Conclusion: The input representation is a controllable and previously overlooked determinant of both predictive performance and explanation quality. Significance: Treating interpretability as a representation-design problem offers a route towards explanations clinicians can check against known electrophysiology.
翻訳サービスが停止中のため原文を表示しています。