Model overview
> **AesCode-8B** is Microsoft's 8B vision-language model, built on Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct, for generating information-rich visual artifacts such as slides, posters, dashboards and reports as structured, editable HTML/CSS. It addresses a gap between two kinds of generator: code models can't see how layout, hierarchy and color come together on the canvas, while image generators compose attractive pages but misrender text, numbers and logical relationships. AesCode therefore takes an image generated from the same prompt as an aesthetic reference and follows the prompt for the required content. Tables come out as HTML table structures and charts as ECharts specifications, so both stay inspectable and verifiable. Training was cold-start SFT on 3,000 demonstrations, followed by GDPO reinforcement learning for 400 steps over 7,408 prompts, using verl and no separately trained reward model. Each target is represented as a design graph, and the reward is split into seven decoupled channels: execution, text, boundary, tablechart, layout, whitespace and design. Deterministic verifiers score what can be parsed from the code and its rendering, and a VLM judge scores the rest against a sample-specific Visual Graph Rubric. On the card's 300 infographic samples, AesCode-8B scores 82.94 Overall (Rule 90.07, Visual 75.80). That is above the reference-conditioned GPT-5.5 (81.28) and Claude Opus 4.8 (80.39), and 31.0 points above its reference-conditioned Qwen3-VL-8B backbone. The 32B companion model leads at 85.89. Style is a ceiling for every system, with no model above 60. The reference image is optional, since withholding it costs AesCode-8B only 1.00 Visual point, versus 19.55 for the base model, though quality is highest with it. The model loads through standard Transformers or vLLM, with the training code, verifier stack and rubric builder released on GitHub. The paper is still listed as under review. It is released under Apache 2.0.
Key features
特点摘要待依据来源补齐，不凭模型名称推断能力。
Limitations & considerations
Sources are insufficient to establish specific limitations. Verify task performance, latency, data policies, licensing and version lifecycle.
Source prices & cost analysis
Prices vary by channel, region and configuration. Channel quotes are listed independently and are not treated as a single official provider price.
| Source / channel | Input | Output | Billing unit | Collected at |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No verified prices yet. Check the source channel. | ||||
Estimate monthly base token costs
Estimates exclude cache discounts, tiered pricing, multimodal surcharges, web search, taxes and additional reasoning output.
Public benchmarks & run configuration
暂无已采集的可核验公开评分。模型未上榜不代表能力较低。
View full indexed rankings →Frequently asked questions
Do open weights permit free commercial use?
Not necessarily. Check the version license, commercial conditions and usage policies. Self-hosting incurs compute and maintenance costs.
Are these real-time billing prices?
These are timestamped source snapshots, not live billing prices. Check the channel for current versions, regions, discounts and billing methods.
Sources & traceability
许可证：apache-2.0。模型介绍与第三方评测均以原来源的具体版本和方法为准。