MODEL PROFILE

Linq-Embed-Mistral

Linq-AI-Research · Linq-Embed-Mistral

Linq-Embed-Mistral has been developed by building upon the foundations of the E5-mistral-7b-instruct and Mistral-7B-v0.1 models. We focus on improving text retrieval using advanced data refinement methods, including sophisticated data crafting, data filtering, and negative mining guided by teacher models, which are highly tailored to each task, to improve the quality of the synthetic data generated by LLM. These methods are applied to both existing benchmark dataset and highly tailored synthetic dataset generated via LLMs. Our efforts primarily aim to create high-quality triplet datasets (query, positive example, negative example), significantly improving text retrieval performance. Linq-Embed-Mistral performs well in the MTEB benchmarks (as of May 29, 2024). The model excels in retrieval tasks, ranking **`1st`** among all models listed on the MTEB leaderboard with a performance score of **`60.2`** . This outstanding performance underscores its superior capability in enhancing search precision and reliability. The model achieves an average score of **`68.2`** across 56 datasets in the MTEB benchmarks, making it the highest-ranking publicly accessible model and third overall. (Please note that NV-Emb-v1 and voyage-large-2-instruct, ranked 1st and 2nd on the leaderboard as of May 29, reported their performance without releasing their models.) This project is for research purposes only. Third-party datasets may be subject to additional terms and conditions under their associated licenses. Please refer to specific papers for more details:

Embeddings & similaritylicense:cc-by-nc-4.0
Context windowNot disclosed
Input → OutputText → Embedding
Model weightsNot verified
Profile updated2026/10/31 11:33:25
OVERVIEW

Model overview

Linq-Embed-Mistral has been developed by building upon the foundations of the E5-mistral-7b-instruct and Mistral-7B-v0.1 models. We focus on improving text retrieval using advanced data refinement methods, including sophisticated data crafting, data filtering, and negative mining guided by teacher models, which are highly tailored to each task, to improve the quality of the synthetic data generated by LLM. These methods are applied to both existing benchmark dataset and highly tailored synthetic dataset generated via LLMs. Our efforts primarily aim to create high-quality triplet datasets (query, positive example, negative example), significantly improving text retrieval performance. Linq-Embed-Mistral performs well in the MTEB benchmarks (as of May 29, 2024). The model excels in retrieval tasks, ranking **`1st`** among all models listed on the MTEB leaderboard with a performance score of **`60.2`** . This outstanding performance underscores its superior capability in enhancing search precision and reliability. The model achieves an average score of **`68.2`** across 56 datasets in the MTEB benchmarks, making it the highest-ranking publicly accessible model and third overall. (Please note that NV-Emb-v1 and voyage-large-2-instruct, ranked 1st and 2nd on the leaderboard as of May 29, reported their performance without releasing their models.) This project is for research purposes only. Third-party datasets may be subject to additional terms and conditions under their associated licenses. Please refer to specific papers for more details:

Key features

特点摘要待依据来源补齐,不凭模型名称推断能力。

Limitations & considerations

Sources are insufficient to establish specific limitations. Verify task performance, latency, data policies, licensing and version lifecycle.

PRICING & COST

Source prices & cost analysis

Prices vary by channel, region and configuration. Channel quotes are listed independently and are not treated as a single official provider price.

Source / channelInputOutputBilling unitCollected at
No verified prices yet. Check the source channel.

Estimate monthly base token costs

—

Estimates exclude cache discounts, tiered pricing, multimodal surcharges, web search, taxes and additional reasoning output.

INDEPENDENT BENCHMARKS

Public benchmarks & run configuration

暂无已采集的可核验公开评分。模型未上榜不代表能力较低。

View full indexed rankings →

Frequently asked questions

Do open weights permit free commercial use?

Not necessarily. Check the version license, commercial conditions and usage policies. Self-hosting incurs compute and maintenance costs.

Are these real-time billing prices?

These are timestamped source snapshots, not live billing prices. Check the channel for current versions, regions, discounts and billing methods.

Sources & traceability

许可证:cc-by-nc-4.0。模型介绍与第三方评测均以原来源的具体版本和方法为准。