Model overview
SmolVLM2-2.2B is a lightweight multimodal model designed to analyze video content. The model processes videos, images, and text inputs to generate text outputs - whether answering questions about media files, comparing visual content, or transcribing text from images. Despite its compact size, requiring only 5.2GB of GPU RAM for video inference, it delivers robust performance on complex multimodal tasks. This efficiency makes it particularly well-suited for on-device applications where computational resources may be limited. - **Developed by:** Hugging Face 🤗 - **Model type:** Multi-modal model (image/multi-image/video/text) - **Language(s) (NLP):** English - **License:** Apache 2.0 - **Architecture:** Based on Idefics3 (see technical summary) - **Demo:** Video Highlight Generator - **Blog:** Blog post
Key features
特点摘要待依据来源补齐，不凭模型名称推断能力。
Limitations & considerations
Sources are insufficient to establish specific limitations. Verify task performance, latency, data policies, licensing and version lifecycle.
Source prices & cost analysis
Prices vary by channel, region and configuration. Channel quotes are listed independently and are not treated as a single official provider price.
| Source / channel | Input | Output | Billing unit | Collected at |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No verified prices yet. Check the source channel. | ||||
Estimate monthly base token costs
Estimates exclude cache discounts, tiered pricing, multimodal surcharges, web search, taxes and additional reasoning output.
Public benchmarks & run configuration
暂无已采集的可核验公开评分。模型未上榜不代表能力较低。
View full indexed rankings →Frequently asked questions
Do open weights permit free commercial use?
Not necessarily. Check the version license, commercial conditions and usage policies. Self-hosting incurs compute and maintenance costs.
Are these real-time billing prices?
These are timestamped source snapshots, not live billing prices. Check the channel for current versions, regions, discounts and billing methods.
Sources & traceability
许可证：apache-2.0。模型介绍与第三方评测均以原来源的具体版本和方法为准。