Model overview
You need two models with the same architecture. - Choose one model and fine-tune it to create a gap between the original model and the fine-tuned one. It doesn't matter whether the evaluation score is higher or lower. - Merge the two models. - Evaluate the merged model. - Fine-tune a specific evaluation part of the model if you need to increase the score for that part. (It's unlikely to work as you think, but you can try it.) - Merge the models again. - Evaluate again. - Keep going until the average evaluation score is higher than the original one.
Key features
特点摘要待依据来源补齐，不凭模型名称推断能力。
Limitations & considerations
Sources are insufficient to establish specific limitations. Verify task performance, latency, data policies, licensing and version lifecycle.
Source prices & cost analysis
Prices vary by channel, region and configuration. Channel quotes are listed independently and are not treated as a single official provider price.
| Source / channel | Input | Output | Billing unit | Collected at |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No verified prices yet. Check the source channel. | ||||
Estimate monthly base token costs
Estimates exclude cache discounts, tiered pricing, multimodal surcharges, web search, taxes and additional reasoning output.
Public benchmarks & run configuration
暂无已采集的可核验公开评分。模型未上榜不代表能力较低。
View full indexed rankings →Frequently asked questions
Do open weights permit free commercial use?
Not necessarily. Check the version license, commercial conditions and usage policies. Self-hosting incurs compute and maintenance costs.
Are these real-time billing prices?
These are timestamped source snapshots, not live billing prices. Check the channel for current versions, regions, discounts and billing methods.
Sources & traceability
许可证：mit。模型介绍与第三方评测均以原来源的具体版本和方法为准。