Model overview
Liquid's refusal behaviour projected out of the original weights, in the second two thirds of the network only. Shipped two ways: six baked GGUF builds, and a 24 MB LoRA adapter for the LFM2.5-24B-A2B quants you already have. The measurements behind this card are public. Built by the team behind Atomic Chat , the app that runs open-weight models locally and offline. On held-out prompts, refusals fall from 96.3% to 1.2% in English, and from 30 of 30 to none with thinking. MMLU stays where it was: 64.40% before, 65.55% after (inside the noise). No empty or looping replies. Only blocks 14-39 are edited. The same edit across all 40 blocks also removed the refusals, but cost 4 MMLU points; the first 14 blocks carry the damage, not the refusal. Already running our LFM2.5-24B-A2B quants ? Add the adapter with --lora-scaled instead of downloading a new model. **`AD-Q4_K_M` is the one to take** on a 24 GB machine. With 32 GB, `AD-Q6_K` is nearly as close to the original as `AD-Q8_0` at 5 GB less; `AD-IQ3_M` is the smallest build here. Refusals were measured on `AD-Q8_0` and `AD-Q4_K_M`; neither gave an empty or looping reply. A smaller `AD-IQ3_XXS` (11.1 GB) was made too and is held back: it matched the original's token choice only 74.5% of the time and refused 3.7% of English prompts.
Key features
特点摘要待依据来源补齐,不凭模型名称推断能力。
Limitations & considerations
Sources are insufficient to establish specific limitations. Verify task performance, latency, data policies, licensing and version lifecycle.
Source prices & cost analysis
Prices vary by channel, region and configuration. Channel quotes are listed independently and are not treated as a single official provider price.
| Source / channel | Input | Output | Billing unit | Collected at |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No verified prices yet. Check the source channel. | ||||
Estimate monthly base token costs
Estimates exclude cache discounts, tiered pricing, multimodal surcharges, web search, taxes and additional reasoning output.
Public benchmarks & run configuration
暂无已采集的可核验公开评分。模型未上榜不代表能力较低。
View full indexed rankings →Frequently asked questions
Do open weights permit free commercial use?
Not necessarily. Check the version license, commercial conditions and usage policies. Self-hosting incurs compute and maintenance costs.
Are these real-time billing prices?
These are timestamped source snapshots, not live billing prices. Check the channel for current versions, regions, discounts and billing methods.
Sources & traceability
许可证:other。模型介绍与第三方评测均以原来源的具体版本和方法为准。