保存済みツールを推薦
FOXAI SEARCH

サイト内検索

ニュース記事 559

inference-systems

b11946

server : add realtime conversation and transcription on /v1/realtime (#31269) * server : add realtime conversation and transcription on /v1/realtime Co-authored-by: Xuan Son Nguyen Assisted-by: Claude Opus 5.5 * examples : default the realtime client to the server port 9931 Assisted-by: Claude Opus 5.5 * server : sample realtime responses right after their own decode Slots respond in turns on one context: sampling at the start of the next step read the logits of whichever slot decoded last, so concurrent sessions mixed their outputs. Assisted-by: Claude Opus 5.5 * move more stuff to server-realtime, making it self-contained * examples : fix the type check of the realtime client Assisted-by: Claude Opus 5.5 * examples : use the model card prompts in the realtime client Assisted-by: Claude O

翻訳サービスが停止中のため原文を表示しています。
llama.cpp のリリース
open-models

3, 7, 14, 17, 42: Instruction Tuning Installs and Sharpens Number-Choice Heuristics in Language Models

arXiv:2610.36178v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We measure, without sampling error, the probability a language model assigns to each integer from 1 to N when asked for a random number. For a fixed prompt the model defines one probability vector, which we compute by summing over each integer's scored spellings rather than estimate by sampling, removing the noise that limits earlier studies [1, 4]. We evaluate 18 open-weight model lines at five ranges up to N = 100, under 29 decoding configurations, on two inference stacks; 15 of them have matched base and instruction-tuned checkpoints that both give usable answers. Instruction tuning makes the distribution less uniform in all 15 pairs. It installs one heuristic, round-number avoidance, and sharpens another, endpoint avoidance. Base checkpoi

翻訳サービスが停止中のため原文を表示しています。
arXiv cs.CL
モデル更新

Detect Before You Disambiguate: Perturbation-Based Input Ambiguity Detection in LLMs

arXiv:2610.36353v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) often answer ambiguous inputs as if they had a single intended meaning. This is problematic because input ambiguity is an upstream source of uncertainty: when a prompt admits multiple valid interpretations, the key question is whether the model should answer directly at all. Existing input uncertainty methods often rely on LLM-generated statements or clarifications, but such transformations may already disambiguate the input before the ambiguity is measured. We propose a label-preserving perturbation framework for input ambiguity detection in which perturbations remain close to the original input while preserving its label. We instantiate this principle with two detectors: a black-box rule-based perturbation libra

翻訳サービスが停止中のため原文を表示しています。
arXiv cs.CL
copyright-privacy

ReCoPII: A Relation-Grounded Framework for Building Contextual PII Masking Datasets

arXiv:2610.35925v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Training contextual masking systems for personally identifiable information (PII) requires examples distinguishing maskable from preservable mentions of one entity type, but privacy restrictions limit access to real data. Author-based augmentation (SPY) labels mentions unrelated to the author as non-PII, presuming a single data subject and overlooking others. We propose ReCoPII (Relation-grounded Contextual PII masking), a framework that builds such data without this premise: it plans ontology-constrained entity relations, writes insertion sentences with placeholders, reconstructs annotations with code, checks the result with a separate LLM, and derives MASK/KEEP labels from entity relations. On Korean documents from six domains, it yields Re

翻訳サービスが停止中のため原文を表示しています。
arXiv cs.CL
研究の進展

Frankly Speaking: The Company Election Integrity Keeps in Congressional Communication

arXiv:2610.36187v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Election integrity is a shared commitment in American politics, but Democrats and Republicans in Congress increasingly mean different things by it. Analyzing 10,420 congressional e-newsletters sent from 2010 to 2025, we examine how the two parties invoke election terms such as ``integrity,'' ``security,'' and ``fraud.'' Using diachronic word embeddings, which track semantic change through how words are used in context, we measure how differently each party uses each term, how much each party shifts, and whether they share nearest semantic neighbors. We show that members of Congress do not need different words to tell different stories about elections. They need only place those same words in different company. Across nearly every term and yea

翻訳サービスが停止中のため原文を表示しています。
arXiv cs.CL